PANDURANGA JRCS WITHOUT AUTHORITY OF LAW FREEZED THE BANK ACCOUNTS OF BBMP SC ST CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY
By: M.S.Yatnatti: Editor and Video Journalist Bangalore: Panduranga Garge KCS without authority of law and provision of law has freeze the Bank accounts of BBMP SC ST Workers Society Ltd without any report indicting all directors of BBMP SC ST Workers Society Ltd and cancelled 3 crore loan sanctioned by Bangalore rural & ramanagara district co operative bank ltd.The BBMP Employees who are drawing salaries and the loan repayment is guaranteed by BBMP under the Law then why Panduranga Garge KCS has freeze the account and cancelled the loan sanctioned to BBMP SC ST Workers Society Ltd when BBMP Emloyees who depend on loans from BBMP SC ST Workers Society Ltd are deprived and this is nothing but economic boycott and social boycott and offence under POA Act.Panduranga Garge KCS need to read KCS Act and let him read section 65 of KCS Act 1959. Let him read content and KCS Act available at department website at http://sahakara.kar.gov.in/faqCo-opSocieties.html .It reportedly and allegedly stated that just pay him bribe he issues and damage the running societies by ordering section 64 and 65 enquires .The case in sight is golden jubilee SC ST Workers Co-operative Society Ltd .It is functioning well but without the application of creditor Panduranga Garge KCS has issued section 65 enquiry and troubling good directors of SC ST Workers Co-operative Society Ltd.This society has no dues to be paid to any bank .No bank has demanded enquiry against SC ST Workers Co-operative Society Ltd.Even then a false 65 enquires is ordered and its accounts are illegally closed in all banks without any authority of law .He says that he can do anything and nobody can take action on him. He has threatened SC ST Workers Co-operative Society Ltd that SC ST cast societies will be eliminated from his department as he can keep pen on any society and That society get finshed .It is said that Aiyappa has ordered enquiry against Panduranga Garge KCS but it is said that someone from CM office is God Father of Panduranga Garge KCS and Aiyappa RCS cannot do anything .When section 65 karnataka co-operative societies act 1959 is ordered ?The Registrar may of his own motion or on the application of a creditor of a co-operative society,inspect or direct any person authorised by him by order in writing in this behalf, to inspect the books of the society.2)Who orders inspection under section 65 ?The Registrar or Registrar of the concerned jurisdiction can order section.65.3)Under which circumstances section.65 inspection held? . Section 65 can be ordered when the applicant:-satisfies the Registrar that the debt is a sum then due and that he has demanded payment thereof and has not received satisfaction within a reasonable time and deposits with the Registrar such sum as security for the costs of the proposed inspection as the Registrar may require.4) whom the inspection report should be communicated? The Registrar shall communicate the results of any such inspection to the Director of co-operatie Audit and (a) Where the inspection is made of his own motion to the society and (b) where the inspection is made on the application of a creditor to the creditor and the society.
No FIR is booked at VV Puram Police Station Bangalore despite complaint by chiranjeevi against Sri Panduranga Garg JRCS Chamarajpet Bangalore Under POA Act Do you know that instituting false, malicious or vexatious suit or criminal or other legal proceedings against members of scheduled castes and a scheduled tribes amounts to an offence under the Act? [SECTION 3 (1) (viii)] A recent research has revealed that only 60 percent of SCs IAS, PCS, doctors and other Officers were aware about this provision. 2 It may also be interesting to know that no case seems to have been filed under this section so far by the SCs or STs.Do you know that giving any false or frivolous information to any public servant and thereby causing such public servant to use his lawful power to the injury or annoyance of a member of scheduled castes and a scheduled tribes amount to an offence under the Act? [SECTION 3 (1) (ix)] A recent research has revealed that only 53 percent of SCs IAS, PCS, doctors and other Officers were aware about this section. 2.Do you know that intentionally insulting or intimidating with intent to humiliate a member of a scheduled caste or a scheduled tribe in any place of public view is punishable under the Act? [SECTION 3 (1) (x)].Do you know that whoever, being a public servant but not being a member of a scheduled caste or a scheduled tribe, willfully neglects his/her duties required to be performed by him/her under this Act is also liable to be severely punished? [SECTION 4] .You may have by now judged your own awareness about the above provisions in the Act. Unfortunately, these provisions have remained on paper because of ignorance on the part of SCs and STs persons. It is shocking to know that no case has ever been filed under SECTION 3 (1) (viii) and (ix) in the country. However, enlightened and educated SCs and STs employees can show the way to their poor brothers and sisters by taking advantage of the protections available under the Act. Let us now discuss the above FOUR of the Act one by one to know how an SC or ST employee can benefit from them in the event of ‘atrocity’ committed upon him/her:It is pertinent to note that despite Complaint is filed by chiranjeevi against Sri Panduranga Garg JRCS Chamarajpet Bangalore Phone :9740966644 a Public Servant for Instituting false, malicious or vexatious legal proceedings no FIR is booked at VV Puram Police Station Bangalore as JRCS allegedly taking huge bribe money has instituted false, malicious or vexatious legal proceedings without following court procedures converting a letter of complaint into a court case without any court procedures on Ravi Kumar and Lingaraju SC ST persons in span of of just 30 just days by Instituting false, malicious or vexatious legal proceedings Section 3(1)(p) of the Act is an atrocity on SC ST Persons and other sections of atrocity Act and IPC sections . Whereas same Sri Panduranga Garg JRCS Chamarajpet Bangalore has not taken any decision by taking huge bribe in an official case filed by Kullayappa in JRB/DISPUTE/29© /07/2013 -14 and despite offence is proved he has not filed FIR against all alleged culprits in respect of misappropriation and causing loss to public money from the year 1992 and 1994 by then president Sri Narayana (bais) and Sri Manikayam as Vice President and Sri Narsimha as Treasurer and others directors of SC ST Workers Co-operative Society Ltd Bangalore to a tune of Rs 7 64 342/- and more in the case filed in JRCS court by Kullayappa in JRB/DISPUTE/29© /07/2013 -14 and whereas in case Ravi Kumar and Lingaraju SC ST persons he converts a false letter of allegations without any affidavit into a case and without authority of law based on that orders section 65 Enquiry despite no bank has complained JRCS about non payments of any loans and based on false letter he cannot order any enquiry on them where as he himself has given clean chit to SC ST Workers Co-operative Society Ltd Bangalore under president ship of Mr Ravi on 22-07-2016 .