Property Politics Daily News Portal

You are not logged in. (Login)

 
Skip Main Menu

Main Menu

Skip Online Users

Online Users

(last 5 minutes)
None
Skip Calendar

Calendar

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Today Sunday, 19 May 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Skip Latest News

Latest News

  • 19 May, 14:08
    Admin User
    BBMP “SWM WORK TENDER” UNDER SECTION 6 OF KTPP ACT WHICH IS LESS THAN 50 LAKHS VALUE NEED TO BE RESERVED “24.10” FOR “SC AND ST” more...
  • 17 May, 12:56
    Admin User
    ECONOMIC ATROCITY IS HAPPENING DIRECT UNDER PARMESHWAR DCM NOSE AGAINST SC ST IN BBMP BANGALORE IN TENDERING PROCESS IN SWM CONTRACTS more...
  • 16 May, 12:26
    Admin User
    INCOME TAX DEPT IS HARASSING BY ISSUING NOTICES TO “NON-PROFIT” (NPO) “SECTION 8 COMPANIES” DESPITE DIRECTORS SHAREHOLDER DO NOT OWN THE COMPANIES more...
  • 15 May, 23:13
    Admin User
    BASAVANGUDI PS” NEED TO SUBMIT SECOND REPORT AGAINST BRANCH MANAGER WHO RELEASED 52 LAKH DSPITE LCC HAD MADE MARK PENDING IN CTS/MICR more...
  • 14 May, 16:52
    Admin User
    KENGERI PS MUST FILE FIR AGAINST “SHANTHI SADHANA” FOR BLOCKING OLD PUBLIC ROAD “WHICH WAS REPORTEDLY CARVED OUT OF 39 GUNTAS OF KHRAB LAND more...
  • 13 May, 13:32
    Admin User
    VIJAYANAGAR POLICE SUB DIVISION HC& PC AS ADMIN TAKE WHATSAPP ROUTE TO REACH OUT TO CITIZENS IN 500 BEATS OF FIVE POLICE STATIONS more...
  • 12 May, 17:01
    Admin User
    BMTF SHOULD ACT AGAINST “SHANTHI SADHANA” FOR BLOCKING OLD PUBLIC ROAD “S.N 34 PATTANGERE HAS 39 GUNTAS OF KHRAB LAND USED BY PUBLIC AS “ROAD” more...
  • 11 May, 10:52
    Admin User
    “SHANTHI SADHANA” SPIRITUAL ORG SHOULD LEARN TO GIVE RIGHTS TO PUBLIC “S.N 34 PATTANGERE HAS 39 GUNTAS OF KHRAB LAND USED BY PUBLIC AS ROAD” more...
  • 10 May, 06:19
    Admin User
    “ADMISSION” CAN BE ONLINE STOP BEELINES AT COLLEGES AS STUDENTS GEAR UP FOR ADMISSION “GO FOR ONLINE COURSES AND CERTIFICATIONS” more...
  • 9 May, 08:27
    Admin User
    CANCEL SALE DEED IN S.NO 42 DUKANHALLI “AS RESOLUTION IS DATED 31.10.1973” OF CITB DOES NOT FALL WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED DATES I.E. 20.12.1973 TO 8.5.1986 more...

Site news

M.S.Yatnatti Editor Property Politics
BBMP “SWM WORK TENDER” UNDER SECTION 6 OF KTPP ACT WHICH IS LESS THAN 50 LAKHS VALUE NEED TO BE RESERVED “24.10” FOR “SC AND ST”
by Admin User - Sunday, 19 May 2019, 02:08 PM
 

By: M.S.Yatnatti: Editor and Video Journalist Bengaluru: Request is made for immediate cancellations of SWM tenders opened by BBMP on 10-05-20 in violation of Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurement Act which was amended to provide reservation to the SC/STs in tenders below Rs 50 lakh and Provide Reservation to the SC/STs contractor in SWM tender called in 2019. It is very simple. Section 6 of KTPP Act has word "Tender " which includes all types of tender as per under section HH of definition of KTPP Act and Tender which is less than 50 lakhs value need to be reserved 24.10 for SC ST as per section 6 of KTPP Act. It is pertinent to note that SWM contract is a work and tender and scope of work or tender is less than 50 lakh coming under section 6 of ammended KTPP Act 2017 Karnataka Act 31 2017 and section 6 is not just limited to construction work and extended to all such works and legislative intent was to give employment to SC and ST people wherefore construction work was not repeated second time instead it was mentioned as such works and 6 read with KTPP Act 2018 amendment in HH (page 2) in which Tender includes all work whether it is material service or construction work. SWM is work and tender less than 50 lakhs and as per KTPP Act So Tender which is less than 50 lakhs needs 24.10 SC ST reservation mandatory.Direct under Dr Parmeshwar Deputy chief Minister Nose economic atrocity is happening against SC ST in BBMP in tendering process. Reservation to the SC/STs contractor not provided in SWM tender called in 2019. Tender was opened on 10-05-2019 despite objections were raised on 11-02-2019 .Amendment to the Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurement Act, 1999 was brought in to provide reservation to the SC/STs in tenders below Rs 50 lakh. Section 6 of KTPP Act has word "Tender " which includes all types of tender as per under section HH of definition of KTPP Act and Tender which is less than 50 lakhs value need to be reserved 24.10 for SC ST as per section 6 of KTPP Act. BBMP Tender for SWM in clause 3.7.1 in page 40 provides to quote the price for monthly tender which is less than 50 lakhs bringing BBMP Tender for SWM below 50 lakh and need to reserve 48 wards out of 198 wards for SC ST .In page 2 to 12 the amount put to tender column tender authority has put 12 months cumulative figure instead of one month figure just to defraud SC ST Contractors to show fraudulently that tender is above 50 lakhs to deprive SC ST Contractors the benefits of Amendment to the Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurement Act, 1999 despite the fact that in clause 3.7.1 in page 40 provides to quote the price for monthly tender which is less than 50 lakhs bringing BBMP Tender for SWM below 50 lakh and need to reserve 48 wards out of 198 wards for SC ST.

M.S.Yatnatti Editor Property Politics
ECONOMIC ATROCITY IS HAPPENING DIRECT UNDER PARMESHWAR DCM NOSE AGAINST SC ST IN BBMP BANGALORE IN TENDERING PROCESS IN SWM CONTRACTS
by Admin User - Friday, 17 May 2019, 12:56 PM
 

By: M.S.Yatnatti: Editor and Video Journalist Bengaluru: Request is made for immediate cancellations of SWM tenders opened by BBMP on 10-05-20 in violation of Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurement Act which was amended to provide reservation to the SC/STs in tenders below Rs 50 lakh. and Provide Reservation to the SC/STs contractor in SWM tender called in 2019.Direct under Dr Parmeshwar Deputy chief Minister Nose economic atrocity is happening against SC ST in BBMP in tendering process. Reservation to the SC/STs contractor not provided in SWM tender called in 2019. Tender was opened on 10-05-2019 despite objections were raised on 11-02-2019 .Amendment to the Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurement Act, 1999 was brought in to provide reservation to the SC/STs in tenders below Rs 50 lakh. BBMP Tender for SWM in clause 3.7.1 in page 40 provides to quote the price for monthly tender which is less than 50 lakhs bringing BBMP Tender for SWM below 50 lakh and need to reserve 48 wards out of 198 wards for SC ST .In page 2 to 12 the amount put to tender column tender authority has put 12 months cumulative figure instead of one month figure just to defraud SC ST Contractors to show fraudulently that tender is above 50 lakhs to deprive SC ST Contractors the benefits of Amendment to the Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurement Act, 1999 despite the fact that in clause 3.7.1 in page 40 provides to quote the price for monthly tender which is less than 50 lakhs bringing BBMP Tender for SWM below 50 lakh and need to reserve 48 wards out of 198 wards for SC ST.

Police need to file FIR on the Executive Engineer SWM and JC SWM if compliant is made by SC person as not providing opportunity to avail the benefits of reservation 24.10 under Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurement Act, 1999 by the Executive Engineer SWM and JC SWM who has committed atrocity on SC ST Contractors under POA Act under 3(I) (zc) and Under Section 2 (I) (bc) . The key features of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2015, are: New offences of atrocities like imposing social or economic boycott have been added . Under Section 2 (I) (bc) “economic boycott” means–(i) a refusal to deal with, work for hire or do business with other person; or(ii) to deny opportunities including access to services or contractual opportunities for rendering service for consideration; or(iii) to refuse to do anything on the terms on which things would be commonly done in the ordinary course of business; or(iv) to abstain from the professional or business relations that one would maintain with other person; and offence under section 3(I) (zc) imposes or threatens a social or economic boycott of any person or a family or a group belonging to a Scheduled Caste or a Scheduled Tribe ,shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than six months but which may extend to five years and with fine.

In spite of various measures to improve the show economic conditions of the scheduled castes and the scheduled Tribes, they remain vulnerable. They are denied number of civil rights. The subjected to various offences, indignities, humiliations and harassment. They have, in several brutal incidents, being deprived of their life and property. Serious crimes are committed against them for various historical, social and economic reasons.Due to the awareness created amongst the scheduled castes and scheduled Tribes through spread of education, they're trying to assert their rights and this is not being taken very kindly by the authors stop when the assert their rights and resist practices of untouchability against them or demand statutory minimum wages or refused to do any bonded and forced labour, the vested interests tried to call them down and terrorize them. When the scheduled castes and scheduled Tribes try to preserve their self-respect or honour of their women, they became irritants for the dominant and the mighty. of late, there has been an increase in the disturbing trend of commission of certain atrocities stopped the normal provisions of the previously existing laws such as protection of civil rights act 1955 and the Indian penal code but found to be inadequate to check these atrocities and hence the necessity was felt to enact the scheduled castes and the Scheduled Tribes (prevention of atrocities) act, 1989 to check and deter crimes against the scheduled castes and scheduled Tribes.

The Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2015 to ensure more stringent provisions for prevention of Atrocities against Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes will be enforced with effect tomorrow i.e. January 26, 2016.Consequent upon passing of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Bill, 2015 by the Lok Sabha on August 04,2015 and Rajya Sabha on December 21, 2015, to make amendments in the Principal Act, namely, the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) {PoA} Act, 1989, the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2015, as assented by the President on December 31, 2015, was notified in the Gazette of India Extraordinary on January 01, 2016. After framing the rules for enactment, now it will be enforced by the Central Government with effect from January 26, 2016.The key features of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2015, are: New offences of atrocities like tonsuring of head, moustache, or similar acts which are derogatory to the dignity of members of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, garlanding with chappals, denying access to irrigation facilities or forest rights , dispose or carry human or animal carcasses, or to dig graves, using or permitting manual scavenging, dedicating a Scheduled Caste or a Scheduled Tribe women as devadasi, abusing in caste name, perpetrating witchcraft atrocities, imposing social or economic boycott, preventing Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes candidates from filing of nomination to contest elections, hurting a Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes woman by removing her garments, forcing a member of Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe to leave house , village or residence, defiling objects sacred to members of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribe, touching or using words, acts or gestures of a sexual nature against members of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribe.•Addition of certain IPC offences like hurt, grievous hurt, intimidation, kidnapping etc., attracting less than ten years of imprisonment, committed against members of Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe, as offences punishable under the PoA Act. Presently, only those offences listed in IPC as attracting punishment of 10 years or more and committed on members of Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe are accepted as offences falling under the PoA Act.•Establishment of Exclusive Special Courts and specification of Exclusive Special Public Prosecutors also, to exclusively try the offences under the PoA Act to enable speedy and expeditious disposal of cases.•Power of Special Courts and Exclusive Special Courts, to take direct cognizance of offence and as far as possible, completion of trial of the case within two months, from the date of filing of the charge sheet.•Addition of chapter on the ‘Rights of Victims and Witnesses’. •Defining clearly the term ‘wilful negligence’ of public servants at all levels, starting from the registration of complaint, and covering aspects of dereliction of duty under this Act.•Addition of presumption to the offences –If the accused was acquainted with the victim or his family, the court will presume that the accused was aware of the caste or tribal identity of the victim unless proved otherwise.

M.S.Yatnatti Editor Property Politics
INCOME TAX DEPT IS HARASSING BY ISSUING NOTICES TO “NON-PROFIT” (NPO) “SECTION 8 COMPANIES” DESPITE DIRECTORS SHAREHOLDER DO NOT OWN THE COMPANIES
by Admin User - Thursday, 16 May 2019, 12:26 PM
 

By : M.S.Yatnatti: Editor and Video Journalist Bangaluru :Government of India need to pass or amend the income tax Act encompassing section 8 companies very clear and unambiguous guidelines as these organization and their directors despite they do not own shares in section 8 companies in are facing unnecessary legal hurdles by income tax department notices . In “not for profit organization” question of buying or selling control does not arise as no one is the owner in the organization .No one person or group of people can own a nonprofit organization. You don't see nonprofit shares traded on stock exchanges, and any equity in a nonprofit organization belongs to the organization itself, not to the board of directors or the staff. Nonprofit assets can be sold, but the proceeds of the sale must benefit the organization, not private parties.If you start a nonprofit and decide at some point in the future that you don't want to do it anymore, you have to walk away from it and leave the running of the organization to someone else. Or, if the time has come to close the doors for good, any assets the organization owns must be distributed to other nonprofits fulfilling a similar mission. NSKFDC was incorporated on 24th January, 1997 under Section 25 (Now section 8) of the Companies Act as a ‘Not For Profit’ Organization. NSKFDC is a wholly owned Government Undertaking under the aegis of Ministry of Social Justice & Empowerment. NSKFDC commenced its operations in October,1997. The Company has an authorized capital of Rs. 710 crores and paid-up capital of Rs 629.99 crores as on date.Government appoints officials and non officials to as directors NSKFDC and this does not get disclosed in their personnel income tax declaration as it does not accrue income to them and as such directors do not get income tax notice then why only AICC President Sri Rahul Gandhi Ji get income tax notice? as he is also Director of young Indian section 8/25 company as that of NSKFDC and other's and such thousands of "Non profit organizations " and companies are registered Under section 25 /Section 8 of companies Act.

M.S.Yatnatti Editor Property Politics
BASAVANGUDI PS” NEED TO SUBMIT SECOND REPORT AGAINST BRANCH MANAGER WHO RELEASED 52 LAKH DSPITE LCC HAD MADE MARK PENDING IN CTS/MICR
by Admin User - Wednesday, 15 May 2019, 11:13 PM
 

By : M.S.Yatnatti Editor and Video Journalist Bengaluru :Basavangudi Police was misguided by Prashnatha Prabhakara KMBL Branch Manager as the complainant . Request is made to Basavan Gudi PS to submit second police report after investigation in CC 12380 /2015 ACMM Baglaore and Basavan Gudi PS can request court to make Prashnatha Prabhakara Branch Manager as accused number one and making as Ramesh Kondur or Smt Shaymala complainant as Prashnatha Prabhakara Branch Manager who admitted in point number 2 of his compliant to the Basvangudi Police Bangalore on 14-11-2013 that he was in knowledge of Mark pending(Cheque is not cleared submitted by customer ) in either in MICR or CTS Zones made by LCC managers though it was showing clear balance in customer account as it is system problem or Bank practice as when Customer deposit a cheque issued by his/her client , The bank will credit the cheque amount to Customer account. and he should not have passed the Mr N Srimurthy customer Cheques /RTGS for Rs 46,00000/- on 03-04-2013 without seeking clarification from Ramesh Kondur or Smt Shaymala of Local Clearing Cell of Kotak Bank as he sought clarification for release of 4 lakhs Cheques to same Mr N Srimurthy customer.The other way is KMBL top official should depose before court and admit the fact that Ramesh Kondur or Smt Shaymala had marked pending in CTS/MICR and it was stand alone mistake of Prashnatha Prabhakara Branch Manager KMBL and there was no mistake of Ramesh Kondur or Smt Shaymala of Local Clearing Cell of Kotak Bank to get them acquitted . It is 8th wonder of the world “At Kotak Mahendra Bank Ltd woman employee is framed in a criminal case in FIR 242/2013 CC 12380 /2015 ACMM Bangalore despite Prashnatha Prabhakara Branch Manager who admitted in point number 2 of his compliant to the Basvangudi Police Bangalore on 14-11-2013 that he was in knowledge of Mark pending(Cheque is not cleared submitted by customer ) in either in MICR or CTS Zones made by LCC managers though it was showing clear balance in customer account as it is system problem error and he should not have passed the Mr N Srimurthy customer Cheques /RTGS for Rs 46,00000/- on 03-04-2013 without seeking clarification from Ramesh Kondur or Smt Shaymala of Local Clearing Cell of Kotak Bank as he sought clarification for release of 4 lakhs Cheques to same Mr N Srimurthy customer.Prashnatha Prabhakara Branch Manager has mentioned Ramesh Kondur or Smt Shaymala name in point 2 of his compliant to the Basvangudi Police Bangalore to unnecessary confuse the police and derail the investigation as himself has complexity in the matter as he was in touch with Mr N Srimurthy customer as whether error or no error of LCC he himself was the in knowledge of Mark pending(Cheque is not cleared) in MICR or CTS Zones which Branch Manager checks every day in the system and despite this he cleared the cheque of Mr N Srimurthy customer though there as mark pending not to clear the cheque submitted by Mr N Srimurthy customer.It was this complexity I was told that he may have applied for anticipatory bail against Basavangudi Poice as he had apprehension that he would be arrested by Police .Despite the fact that it was a erroneous entry in CTS zone Prashnatha Prabhakara Branch Manager was in knowledge of Mark pending (Cheque is not cleared) in MICR/CTS Zones it was stand alone action /mistake of BM in releasing Mr N Srimurthy customer Rs 46,00000/- without seeking clarification from LCC for which he cannot blame Ramesh Kondur or Smt Shaymala of LCC or any other staff of Kotak Bank.There is no mistake of Mangers working at LCC at Bangalore and RBI Bangalore .Making them accused in the case was not warranted. Complainant himself should have been made accused. Two managers were arrested at no fault of them in presence of KMBL legal team .For no fault of them KMBL have defamed and jailed and spoiled their lives and KMBL not solving this problem legally this case then Ramesh Kondur or Smt Shaymala may file defamation case against KMBL and Sri Prashantha Prabhakara ,Branch manager Basavan Gudi Branch KMBL Benagaluru-560004 and Easwaran for at least 2.5 crore jointly and severally as they allowed criminal to file a complaint mentioning their names in point 2 as suspected of crime though they had not cleared the cheque by making mark pending not to clear the cheque in system submitted by Mr N Srimurthy customer in MICR or CTS and that he was in knowledge of Mark pending. This case need to be solved legally and KMBL need o compensate Ramesh Kondur or Smt Shaymala immediately.There is no mistake of Mangers working at LCC at Bangalore and RBI Bangalore even it is not a mistake of Bank customers Mr N Srimurthy and Sri Papanna.It was a system error prevalent in clearing system at RBI and cheque return dropping process and there is no acknowledgement process and this is acknowledged by Easwaran Regional head of KMBL as per his e-mail 25-04-2013 .

M.S.Yatnatti Editor Property Politics
KENGERI PS MUST FILE FIR AGAINST “SHANTHI SADHANA” FOR BLOCKING OLD PUBLIC ROAD “WHICH WAS REPORTEDLY CARVED OUT OF 39 GUNTAS OF KHRAB LAND
by Admin User - Tuesday, 14 May 2019, 04:52 PM
 

By: M.S.Yatnatti: Editor and Video Journalist Bengaluru: Construction of wall blocking a century old road between Jairamdas railway gate leading to Darshan college which is reportedly created out of 39 Guntas of Khrab Government land Survey number 34 pattangere village is criminal act which no body expect from Shanthi Sadhana .Kengeri Police is requested to file FIR .Existing compound of stones is their boundary of property. Survey number 34 pattangere village has 39 Guntas of Khrab land which is used by Public as as Road known as Jayaramdas Darshan College railway parallel Road .It is Government land which cannot be blocked by the owner of the land. It is pertinent to mention that Kharab ‘A’ land is capable of ownership and cannot be claimed to be adjunct to cultivable land. Kharab ‘A’ land does not get automatically transferred along with adjoining agricultural/cultivable area. Merely because a land is classified as “A” and “B” kharab, it cannot be assumed that it is under private ownership. Significantly, section 67(1) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 declares that all lands which are not the property of any person are the property of the state government. It provides:All public roads, streets, lanes, paths, bridges, ditches, dikes, fences.The bed of: The sea, harbors, creeks below high water mark and of rivers,Streams, nalas, lakes Tanks, and all canals and watercourses.All standing and flowing waters, andAll lands wherever situated which are not the property of individuals or of aggregate of persons legally capable of holding property, and except insofar as any rights of such persons may be established, in or over the same, and except as may be otherwise provided in any law for the time being in force, are and are hereby declared to be with all rights in or over the same or appertaining thereto, the property of the State government.This is a spiritual organization should learn to give up the rights of people and not snatching them .Kengeri Police is requested to act immediately against Shanthi Sadan Franciscan Institute of Spirituality in India (FISI) Shanti Sadhana (Bengaluru) Spirituality Centre run by the Franciscan Capuchin Friars who have created law and order problem by blocking century old access to road . “Shanthi Sadhana” got its land in survey number 34 pattamgere village and got DC converted in ALNSR(S) 125 /88-89 dated 20-03-1989 for two acres of land and out of 2 acres 45% ought to have relinquished to BDA which “Shanthi Sadhana” never did instead encroached the public road and closed it for public and for this crime BBMP and BMTF should file FIR on “Shanthi Sadhana” and clear the encroachment and get 45% of land to BBMP/BDA immediately and clear the public road and tar it as railway parallel road as metro station need connectivity . The DC conversion order specifies that approval of the layout and buildings should be obtained from BDA, and that specific portions would need to be relinquished towards roads and open spaces, as per the rules laid down by BDA.Those who own properties in BDA-jurisdiction would be aware that one of the conditions for sanction of a DC Conversion or layout’s development plan is that the roads, parks and open spaces of 45% of area are relinquished to BDA, as is also a portion of the total land area, towards a civic amenities (CA) site. As per the Karnataka Town and Country Planning (KTCP) Act, 1961, the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) is the designated planning authority for new layouts (either standalone sites/homes or apartment complexes) and approvals need to be in line with the Revised Master Plan (RMP) 2015.As per RMP-2015 (Chapter 6/ Chapter 7) 10% of the land shall be reserved for Park and Open space. The open space (park) shall be relinquished to the authority free of cost and the same may be allowed to be maintained by the local residents association (registered), if the Authority so desires. A minimum 5% of total plot area shall be provided for Civic Amenities and the owner or developer shall develop such civic amenities which finally shall be handed over to the local residents’ association for maintenance. The mode of such handing over shall be decided by the authority.Apart from the provision for amenities and open spaces, the area for residential development shall be up to a maximum of 55 % of the total land area.The Karnataka High Court judge Huluvadi Ramesh disposed of the petition by passing an order, on 5th November 2014 in Writ Petition, No. WP/9882/2014, in the Karnataka High Court it was held that ““In the event the property falls within the BDA limits, then necessarily the BDA has to verify and consider it for taking over possession and maintenance of civic amenity. If the property falls within the corporation limit, then it is for the corporation to take this responsibility and to do the needful.”It goes on to state that the BDA needs “to examine whether the property falls within the jurisdiction of BDA or corporation and thereafter, the grievance of the petitioners could be met if it is legal.” This was following the submission of the counsel for the developer that APD had already relinquished the land in favour of BBMP, a point which was not confirmed with any document. According to Subbu Hegde, only the roads have been relinquished.

M.S.Yatnatti Editor Property Politics
VIJAYANAGAR POLICE SUB DIVISION HC& PC AS ADMIN TAKE WHATSAPP ROUTE TO REACH OUT TO CITIZENS IN 500 BEATS OF FIVE POLICE STATIONS
by Admin User - Monday, 13 May 2019, 01:32 PM
 

By: M.S.Yatnatti: Editor and Video Journalist Bengaluru: Let us congratulate Vijayanagar Police sub-division for using Technology for better policing. Every Police Sub-Division can adopt this method .WhatsApp groups are in sync with police beats in Vijayanagar subdivision. For better administration, areas under the jurisdiction of a police station are divided into different beats and assigned to head constables or constables. Each of the 500 beats in the five police stations of Vijayanagar subdivision have a WhatsApp group, with the respective head constables and constables as administrators.The beat heads take care of issuing warrants, identifying repeat offenders, verification of passport or job applications, checking arms licences and most importantly, regularly interacting with residents and locals. Reportedly ACP HN Dharmendra is successfully handling these beats. There around 100 beats in each police stations with at least 50 members in each group,” according to reports . Social media is very important to communicate . In changing times, the benefits of a tech-driven work culture cannot be overstated. Most departments have a Facebook page or Twitter handle, but Vijayanagar cops, who make use of WhatsApp to stay connected with citizens and share information quickly, are above the rest. Social media can is powerful tool to humanise the force, and at the same time, precautions need to be taken to avoid rapid sharing of misinformation.

“Learn how elite leaders conceive and execute strategies that drive the world’s fastest growing digital companies. Make yourself more marketable and put your career in top gear with a Professional Certificate in Digital Marketing from IIMS at iimsbengaluru.org at proposed IIMS smart class rooms. Learn the key marketing skills most in-demand today: omni-channel marketing, marketing analytics, social media strategy and analysis, and data-driven customer-centric approaches to customer retention.”.Instant Messenger whatsApp and Telegram are a great way to do business if used properly within legal limits. With Telegram 4.1, we're increasing the maximum size of supergroups to 10,000 members each. That’s a lot of people packed into one group, and now users and admins can use search to find specific users among them: Nearly no-cost no-frill .If used smartly it can change the way communication is done in India and across the globe .The world is literally running on communication .Be it is job application or a political campaign or anything under the sun communication is pivotal for their success and with gamut of brands rapidly using to communicate with their consumers and customers on daily basis .The companies are providing their what’s App numbers in tier advertisements so that potential customers could enquire about their products and services . whatsApp can be used for internal group discussion in the enterprises .The companies can have separate groups for each business units and teachers can have each group for their students wherein important information can be shared with everyone. It is a perfect tool to keep everyone in loop and help each team member by offering information needed. It is interesting to note that while whats app is great tool to do business efficiently but Indian companies yet not have embraced it fully .Once they realize the value of of this simple App and it could be next big thing in communication space in the country.

M.S.Yatnatti Editor Property Politics
BMTF SHOULD ACT AGAINST “SHANTHI SADHANA” FOR BLOCKING OLD PUBLIC ROAD “S.N 34 PATTANGERE HAS 39 GUNTAS OF KHRAB LAND USED BY PUBLIC AS “ROAD”
by Admin User - Sunday, 12 May 2019, 05:01 PM
 

By: M.S.Yatnatti: Editor and Video Journalist Bengaluru: Construction of wall blocking a century old road between Jairamdas railway gate leading to Darshan college is criminal act which no body expect from Shanthi Sadhana .Existing compound of stones is their boundary of property. Survey number 34 pattangere village has 39 Guntas of Khrab land which is used by Public as as Road known as Jayaramdas Darshan College railway parallel Road .It is Government land which cannot be blocked by the owner of the land. It is pertinent to mention that Kharab ‘A’ land is capable of ownership and cannot be claimed to be adjunct to cultivable land. Kharab ‘A’ land does not get automatically transferred along with adjoining agricultural/cultivable area. Merely because a land is classified as “A” and “B” kharab, it cannot be assumed that it is under private ownership. Significantly, section 67(1) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 declares that all lands which are not the property of any person are the property of the state government. It provides:All public roads, streets, lanes, paths, bridges, ditches, dikes, fences.The bed of: The sea, harbors, creeks below high water mark and of rivers,Streams, nalas, lakes Tanks, and all canals and watercourses.All standing and flowing waters, andAll lands wherever situated which are not the property of individuals or of aggregate of persons legally capable of holding property, and except insofar as any rights of such persons may be established, in or over the same, and except as may be otherwise provided in any law for the time being in force, are and are hereby declared to be with all rights in or over the same or appertaining thereto, the property of the State government.This is a spiritual organization should learn to give up the rights of people and not snatching them .Kengeri Police is requested to act immediately against Shanthi Sadan Franciscan Institute of Spirituality in India (FISI) Shanti Sadhana (Bengaluru) Spirituality Centre run by the Franciscan Capuchin Friars who have created law and order problem by blocking century old access to road . “Shanthi Sadhana” got its land in survey number 34 pattamgere village and got DC converted in ALNSR(S) 125 /88-89 dated 20-03-1989 for two acres of land and out of 2 acres 45% ought to have relinquished to BDA which “Shanthi Sadhana” never did instead encroached the public road and closed it for public and for this crime BBMP and BMTF should file FIR on “Shanthi Sadhana” and clear the encroachment and get 45% of land to BBMP/BDA immediately and clear the public road and tar it as railway parallel road as metro station need connectivity . The DC conversion order specifies that approval of the layout and buildings should be obtained from BDA, and that specific portions would need to be relinquished towards roads and open spaces, as per the rules laid down by BDA.Those who own properties in BDA-jurisdiction would be aware that one of the conditions for sanction of a DC Conversion or layout’s development plan is that the roads, parks and open spaces of 45% of area are relinquished to BDA, as is also a portion of the total land area, towards a civic amenities (CA) site. As per the Karnataka Town and Country Planning (KTCP) Act, 1961, the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) is the designated planning authority for new layouts (either standalone sites/homes or apartment complexes) and approvals need to be in line with the Revised Master Plan (RMP) 2015.As per RMP-2015 (Chapter 6/ Chapter 7) 10% of the land shall be reserved for Park and Open space. The open space (park) shall be relinquished to the authority free of cost and the same may be allowed to be maintained by the local residents association (registered), if the Authority so desires. A minimum 5% of total plot area shall be provided for Civic Amenities and the owner or developer shall develop such civic amenities which finally shall be handed over to the local residents’ association for maintenance. The mode of such handing over shall be decided by the authority.Apart from the provision for amenities and open spaces, the area for residential development shall be up to a maximum of 55 % of the total land area.The Karnataka High Court judge Huluvadi Ramesh disposed of the petition by passing an order, on 5th November 2014 in Writ Petition, No. WP/9882/2014, in the Karnataka High Court it was held that ““In the event the property falls within the BDA limits, then necessarily the BDA has to verify and consider it for taking over possession and maintenance of civic amenity. If the property falls within the corporation limit, then it is for the corporation to take this responsibility and to do the needful.”It goes on to state that the BDA needs “to examine whether the property falls within the jurisdiction of BDA or corporation and thereafter, the grievance of the petitioners could be met if it is legal.” This was following the submission of the counsel for the developer that APD had already relinquished the land in favour of BBMP, a point which was not confirmed with any document. According to Subbu Hegde, only the roads have been relinquished.

M.S.Yatnatti Editor Property Politics
“SHANTHI SADHANA” SPIRITUAL ORG SHOULD LEARN TO GIVE RIGHTS TO PUBLIC “S.N 34 PATTANGERE HAS 39 GUNTAS OF KHRAB LAND USED BY PUBLIC AS ROAD”
by Admin User - Saturday, 11 May 2019, 10:52 AM
 

By: M.S.Yatnatti: Editor and Video Journalist Bengaluru: Construction of wall blocking a century old road between Jairamdas railway gate leading to Darshan college is criminal act which no body expect from Shanthi Sadhana .Existing compound of stones is their boundary of property. Survey number 34 pattangere village has 39 Guntas of Khrab land which is used by Public as as Road known as Jayaramdas Darshan College railway parallel Road .It is Government land which cannot be blocked by the owner of the land. It is pertinent to mention that Kharab ‘A’ land is capable of ownership and cannot be claimed to be adjunct to cultivable land. Kharab ‘A’ land does not get automatically transferred along with adjoining agricultural/cultivable area. Merely because a land is classified as ‘A’ kharab, it cannot be assumed that it is under private ownership. Significantly, section 67(1) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 declares that all lands which are not the property of any person are the property of the state government. It provides:All public roads, streets, lanes, paths, bridges, ditches, dikes, fences.The bed of: The sea, harbors, creeks below high water mark and of rivers,Streams, nalas, lakes Tanks, and all canals and watercourses.All standing and flowing waters, andAll lands wherever situated which are not the property of individuals or of aggregate of persons legally capable of holding property, and except insofar as any rights of such persons may be established, in or over the same, and except as may be otherwise provided in any law for the time being in force, are and are hereby declared to be with all rights in or over the same or appertaining thereto, the property of the State government.This is a spiritual organization should learn to give up the rights of people and not snatching them .Kengeri Police is requested to act immediately against Shanthi Sadan Franciscan Institute of Spirituality in India (FISI) Shanti Sadhana (Bengaluru) Spirituality Centre run by the Franciscan Capuchin Friars who have created law and order problem by blocking century old access to road . “Shanthi Sadhana” got its land in survey number 34 pattamgere village and got DC converted in ALNSR(S) 125 /88-89 dated 20-03-1989 for two acres of land and out of 2 acres 45% ought to have relinquished to BDA which “Shanthi Sadhana” never did instead encroached the public road and closed it for public and for this crime BBMP and BMTF should file FIR on “Shanthi Sadhana” and clear the encroachment and get 45% of land to BBMP/BDA immediately and clear the public road and tar it as railway parallel road as metro station need connectivity . The DC conversion order specifies that approval of the layout and buildings should be obtained from BDA, and that specific portions would need to be relinquished towards roads and open spaces, as per the rules laid down by BDA.Those who own properties in BDA-jurisdiction would be aware that one of the conditions for sanction of a DC Conversion or layout’s development plan is that the roads, parks and open spaces of 45% of area are relinquished to BDA, as is also a portion of the total land area, towards a civic amenities (CA) site. As per the Karnataka Town and Country Planning (KTCP) Act, 1961, the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) is the designated planning authority for new layouts (either standalone sites/homes or apartment complexes) and approvals need to be in line with the Revised Master Plan (RMP) 2015.As per RMP-2015 (Chapter 6/ Chapter 7) 10% of the land shall be reserved for Park and Open space. The open space (park) shall be relinquished to the authority free of cost and the same may be allowed to be maintained by the local residents association (registered), if the Authority so desires. A minimum 5% of total plot area shall be provided for Civic Amenities and the owner or developer shall develop such civic amenities which finally shall be handed over to the local residents’ association for maintenance. The mode of such handing over shall be decided by the authority.Apart from the provision for amenities and open spaces, the area for residential development shall be up to a maximum of 55 % of the total land area.The Karnataka High Court judge Huluvadi Ramesh disposed of the petition by passing an order, on 5th November 2014 in Writ Petition, No. WP/9882/2014, in the Karnataka High Court it was held that ““In the event the property falls within the BDA limits, then necessarily the BDA has to verify and consider it for taking over possession and maintenance of civic amenity. If the property falls within the corporation limit, then it is for the corporation to take this responsibility and to do the needful.”It goes on to state that the BDA needs “to examine whether the property falls within the jurisdiction of BDA or corporation and thereafter, the grievance of the petitioners could be met if it is legal.” This was following the submission of the counsel for the developer that APD had already relinquished the land in favour of BBMP, a point which was not confirmed with any document. According to Subbu Hegde, only the roads have been relinquished.

M.S.Yatnatti Editor Property Politics
“ADMISSION” CAN BE ONLINE STOP BEELINES AT COLLEGES AS STUDENTS GEAR UP FOR ADMISSION “GO FOR ONLINE COURSES AND CERTIFICATIONS”
by Admin User - Friday, 10 May 2019, 06:19 AM
 

By: M.S.Yatnatti: Editor and Video Journalist Bangalore: Reportedly many software companies are launching online courses and certifications .Think beyond degrees. Make in India Skill India or Digital India can only be successful if they reach each and every one in India Certifications by reputed organizations in Management and IT are gaining ground as employers are giving more wattage to training and certifications while acquiring talent acquisitions .Universities and schools used to be the only places to deliver formalized learning, certified through a degree qualification that remained valid for life.For students, choosing a course that can take them on the path to a flourishing career is easier said than done. Many youngsters are often in a dilemma and this is a natural phase, say education counsellors. Yes, there is a solution for every query if they are guided well and do not fall prey to peer or parental pressure, say academic experts.

The PUC and 12 Std results are out and students are hurrying to bag a seat in the college of their choice. While some have already decided which branch of study they will pursue in their undergraduate course, others may be undecided, depending on their performance.Reportedly Following the declaration of the Second PUC and SSLC examination results , students could be seen making beelines in front of pre-university and degree colleges across the city which need to be avoided by making online admission process in all colleges . Toppers say there isn't a universal mantra to beat the game. For some it's good sleep and a healthy lifestyle, for a few others, it's a strict 10-hour regime, and extracurricular activity for some others. Students who wish to make a career in management or business have a number of courses to pick from.

They can select from courses such as the Bachelor of Management Studies (BMS), Bachelor of Commerce in Accounting & Finance (BAF), BCom in Banking and Insurance (BBI), BCom in Financial Markets (BFM) and BCom. The BMS is a holistic course in management covering various business-related subjects such as marketing, management, accounting, finance and information technology for business. “Students who do not get an engineering or medicine seat after being coerced into it by their parents, should not lose heart. They can pursue any other course that they are passionate about such as hotel management, fashion and design, advertising, journalism and so on. The most important ingredient they must possess is conviction in themselves,““Schools are not allowed to fail students in lower classes even if their performance is bad. But when they come to class 10, they are suddenly asked to face board exams and are under pressure. Till then, there's no fear of exams and parents are also unaware of their children's performance. These have impacted the quality of education,“ says a teacher . “Students are more callous about their education today. Pressure is built suddenly in classes 9 and 10 but it should be applied in a gradual manner from class 7 onwards,“.

M.S.Yatnatti Editor Property Politics
CANCEL SALE DEED IN S.NO 42 DUKANHALLI “AS RESOLUTION IS DATED 31.10.1973” OF CITB DOES NOT FALL WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED DATES I.E. 20.12.1973 TO 8.5.1986
by Admin User - Thursday, 9 May 2019, 08:27 AM
 

By : M.S.Yatnatti: Editor and Video Journalist Bangalore : : BDA need to Cancel sale deed of Smt Lakshmi Devi Ramanna in respect of Site No 1198 and 1199 in S.No 42 Dukanhalli Villlage Kasba Hobli HAL 2nd Stage Bangalore as the resolution of CITB in respect of Site No 1198 and 1199 in S.No 42 Dukanhalli Villlage does not fall within the prescribed dates i.e. 20.12.1973 to 8.5.1986 as the resolution of the CITB is dated 31.10.1973. Reconvey Site No 1198 and 1199 in S.No 50 Dukanhalli Villlage Kasba Hobli HAL 2nd Stage Bangalore to Muniswamy as per resolution in Subject No. 378 by the Bangalore Development Authority's meeting dated 17-11-1982 as per Section 5 of the Amendment Act introduced Section 38-C in the Act and Section 9 of the Amendment Act validated the allotments made between 20.12.1973 to 8.5.1986 retrospectively. How many years AC (R&R) need to execute the re-convey sale deed to Sri Muniswamy s/o Abbaiah despite he has submitted all documents as per law. The Honble Karnataka high court has issued directions to consider the application of Sri Muniswamy in WP No 26405/2017 (LA-BDA) dated 01-04-2019. In citation of Supreme Court of India Bangalore Development Authority ... vs R. Hanumaiah & Others on 3 October, 2005 it is held that “Moreover, Section 9 of the Amendment Act would also be not applicable as the resolution of CITB does not fall within the prescribed dates i.e. 20.12.1973 to 8.5.1986. In the present case, the resolution of the CITB predecessor-in-interest is dated 19.4.1972 and it would not be deemed to be validated by the deemed fiction created by Section 9 of the Amendment Act to bring it within the provisions of Section 38 -C. Wherefore in case of Site No 1198 and 1199 in S.No 42 Dukanhalli Villlage , the resolution of the CITB predecessor-in-interest is dated 31.10.1973 and it would not be deemed to be validated by the deemed fiction created by Section 9 of the Amendment Act to bring it within the provisions of Section 38 –C as Section 9 of the Amendment Act would also be not applicable as the resolution of CITB does not fall within the prescribed dates i.e. 20.12.1973 to 8.5.1986. As per Supreme Court order cancellation of sale deeds in respect of Site No 1198 and 1199 in S.No 42 Dukanhalli Villlage Kasba Hobli HAL 2nd Stage Bangalore has to happen forth with as it was done in case of R. Hanumaiah & Others. BDA need to cancel illegal re-convey of alternate site given to Smt Lakshmi Devi Ramanna in respect of Site No 1198 and 1199 in S.No 42 Dukanhalli Villlage Kasba Hobli HAL 2nd Stage Bangalore.BDA need to realize the gravity of situation.BDA need to Cancel sale deed of Smt Lakshmi Devi Ramanna in respect of Site No 1198 and 1199 in S.No 42 Dukanhalli Villlage Kasba Hobli HAL 2nd Stage Bangalore as alternate site cannot be allotted in re-convey section and execute the sale deed to Sri Muniswamy s/o Abbaiah for three sites forthwith as per section 38C of BDA Act . Sri Muniswamy s/o Abbaiah has Submitted the true copies of Documents 0n 10-08-2015 (signed by Gazetted officer or Notarised )as per letter of Assistant commissioner (R&R) number AC/R&R/50/15-16 Dated 27-07-2015 in respect of Re-Conveyance and execution of absolute Sale deed in Survey Number 50 Dookanhalli Indra Nagar Post, HAL 2ND Stage Bangalore: 560038 (Facing 100 feet Road) as per resolution in Subject No. 378 by the Bangalore Development Authority's meeting dated 17-11-1982 as per Section 5 of the Amendment Act introduced Section 38-C in the Act and Section 9 of the Amendment Act validated the allotments made between 20.12.1973 to 8.5.1986 retrospectively.


Property Politics Daily News Portal

Online TV Video and Cyber media.Blunt and Sharp News

Website with online Video news at: www.propertypolitics.net Mobile: 9945116476


CONSULTANCY

HELP LINE

You may have problems with Government Departments PWD, BDA, BMRDA, KIADB, TOWN PLANNING DEPARTMENTS AND Development Authorities BBMP, Taluka office, D.C. Office, Corporation, K.S.R.T.C., Commercial Tax Offices, K.E.B., Pension problems, Acquisitions of Land Problems , Khata, Bifurcation, Tax Revision. Banks Problems etc, which may be have been pending for months, and years in Government files etc.

Everybody is facing

Problems, Problems?

Kindly write to us, we analyze and convince our selves and if appropriate then we will take your problems, to concerned authorities, ministries, i.e., through our news paper property politics and try to help you. We also provide consultancy and Liaison service on case to case bases as per agreed terms and fees. Write your problems with Xerox copies,

M.S.Yatnatti , Editor Video Journalist & Consultant

Mobile: 9945116476

E-Mail: msyatnatti@yahoo.com propertypolitics@gmail.com

www.propertypolitics.net



Skip Loan calculator

Loan calculator

Amount of loan
calculate
Repayment amount
calculate
Loan term (years)
calculate
Interest rate
Repayment frequency
Skip LoginSkip Search Forums

Search Forums